Dependent Origination¶
Basic principle¶
Dependent origination (paṭiccasamuppāda) expresses conditionality:
when this is, that is
with the arising of this, that arises
when this is not, that is not
with the cessation of this, that ceases
Twelve-factor presentation¶
SN 12.2 defines:
- ignorance;
- formations or choices;
- consciousness;
- name-and-form;
- six sense bases;
- contact;
- feeling;
- craving;
- clinging;
- becoming;
- birth;
- aging-and-death, sorrow, and distress.
With ignorance as condition, formations occur, and so forth. With the fading and cessation of ignorance, the sequence ceases.
What the sequence explains¶
It explains how dukkha is conditionally maintained without requiring:
- a creator;
- a permanent self;
- pure randomness;
- fatalistic predetermination.
The model can be examined at several scales. The discourses explicitly connect it with birth and death; parts of the sequence can also be observed in present experience, such as feeling conditioning craving.
Two important relationships¶
DN 15 gives special attention to the reciprocal conditioning of consciousness and name-and-form. MN 9 embeds dependent-origination factors inside a broader account of right view.
Interpretive cautions¶
- Reducing the entire teaching to one psychological instant omits its canonical rebirth context.
- Reducing it only to three lives can hide processes observable now.
- Conditionality is not necessarily a simple one-way mechanical chain.
- Ignorance is not a first cause; the discourses describe beginningless wandering rather than an identifiable first event.
Practice inquiry¶
During a difficult reaction, look backward:
clinging ← craving ← feeling ← contact
Ask which link is directly observable and what happens when it is known without feeding the next link.